Tami Stainfield
3256 Mexico Road
Marion, KY 42064
United States
ph: 270-965-1898
January 9, 2012
United States Congress
President of the United States
Supreme Court of the United States
United Nation and its Members
United States Military Forces
Dear Gentlemen and Ladies:
With urgency I ask for your organizations time, resources, and knowledge to attend to a condition that violates the people’s right to ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’. The United States legal and moral frameworks have been instituted to protect an individual’s inalienable rights, natural rights, sovereignty and their right to a ‘Republican form of Government’. These principles were defined in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States.
For nineteen months I have known that I am a victim of brain and body science. Since then I have asked for protection utilizing the justice system instituted in our Constitution. Records at the Pentagon will verify that I documented and asked various Police, White House Security, FBI, and attorneys to assist in this matter. However, the United States legal system, media and international agencies have remained silent with no action to resolve this matter.
Enclosed are eleven videos, they remain unedited an demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt that I am a victim of science that violates all moral and legal doctrines defined in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the United States, US statue 18. U.S.C. 2340-2340A for Torture, United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and United Nations Declaration on Human Rights.
After watching the videos; you will conclude this communication is justified; for ALL of my natural and unalienable rights have been violated. Furthermore, with grave concern law enforcement officials are lacking the expertise and/or will to collect, investigate and prosecute this torture. I am a woman with evidence that proves I and others are victims of predictive analytics robotics and human logistics; we are tortured, hostages, and slaves to a network of technology that is void of identification. My personal sovereignty and conscience has been occupied by unknown persons and software with no form of protection. In 1778 at the Essex Constitution Convention it was declared:
What this conscience dictates as our duty, is so; and that power which assumes a control over it, is an usurper; for no consent can be pleaded to justify the control, as any consent in this case is void.
Furthermore consciousness is defined as “a term that refers to the relationship between the mind and the world with which it interacts. It has been defined as: subjectivity, awareness, the ability to experience or to feel, wakefulness, having a sense of selfhood, and the executive control system of the mind.” (Wikipedia 2012)
Based on two Constitutional precedents that have been established in American political and judicial thought I am legally permitted to address all of your institutions; they are,
first, United States was defined as a ‘Republic form of Government’ and second, article 4, section 4 of the Constitution of the United States remains a political question. (Luther v. Borden, 1849)
In the Republican form of Government the powers of sovereignty remain with the people; as defined in the Preamble of the Constitution of the United States. Furthermore, Madison described how the Republican form of Government governs through representation premised on “a small number of citizens elected by the rest.” An thereafter representation shall act in the best interest of the United States citizens by governing from the principles defined in the Constitution.
The Republican form of Government can only endure if representation governs by utilizing the principles instituted in the Constitution and not through majority citizenry, groups, or foreign interests. The United States was to be “an empire of laws, and not of men” therefore, if the condition occurred where the United States Government stopped protecting an individual’s right to freedom of conscience and justice; the Republican form of Government would cease to be legitimate.
Economist Tench Coxe and Governor Edmund Randolph provided popular views regarding the purpose and rationale for the guarantee clause, Tench Coxe stated in 1787,
The states can alter and amend their several constitutions, provided they do not make them aristocratical, oligarchic or monarchical - for the federal constitution restrains them from any alterations that are not really republican. That is, the sovereignty of the people is never to be infringed or destroyed.
Washington argued “If in the opinion of the people the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be correct by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates.” The framework or precedent was established if modifications were to be made, our representatives would have to amended then ratify the Constitution. To further secure the citizens right to a Republican form of Government our Republic has a legal mandate where each representative elected into office pledges to “support and defend the Constitution” and the President must “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.”
In summary, I have provided evidence that is undisputable; I am a victim of terror and an individual void of ‘rule of law’ as are many other Americans. This condition voids the core principles of a Republican form of Government, the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights and the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political rights.
Therefore, with urgency I ask for international intervention; and furthermore I am making a formal request that the United Nations Security Council immediately suspend the current illegitimate government that represents the people of the United States, for it has usurped our citizens’ right to sovereignty and our right to justice. My country has technology that allows unidentified persons and software the power to seize a person’s natural and inalienable rights with no form of protection.
Lastly, in 1803 St. George Tucker discussed the right of conscience in relation to freedom of the press and religion, I ask with fear; how can the altering and controlling of a person's conscious and body occur in the 21st century?
Thought and speech are equally the immediate gifts of the Creator, the one being intended as the vehicle of the other: they ought, therefore, to have been wholly exempt from the coercion of human laws in all speculative and doctrinal points whatsoever: liberty of speech in political matters, has been equally proscribed in almost all the governments of the worlds, as liberty of conscience in those of religion. A complete tyranny over the human mind could never have been exercised whilst the organ by which our sentiments are conveyed to others, was free:
In advance, thank you for your time, I recognize that I am not the first victim; however I hope those with power will assist any person in the world that has become a victim of this terror. After nineteen months of terror - please stop and ban the technology and science that allowed this torture to occur.
Sincerely,
Tami L. Stainfield
www.tamistainfield.com
Enclosures: Literary References; Why United States Government is an Oligarchy form of Government; Comments written in my notebook 7/2010 – 9/2010; Attorney letter Pentagon 10/31/2010; and Eleven Videos. https://www.youtube.com/user/TamiStainfield/videos
Literary References for Site Creation.
Alexis de Tocqueville. 1835. Democracy in America. http://library.cqpress.com/scc/document (accessed Oct 5, 2010).
American Heritage College Dictionary. 2000. Apartheid. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
American Memory Fellow Program. After the Revolution: Anxiety and Identity in the Creation of the United States, Facilitator: Randy Bass. http://cct2.edc.org/NDL/1998/institute/activities/revolution.html (accessed Aug 2011).
Brookhiser, Richard. 1996. Founding Father Rediscovering Washington. New York: The Free Press.
Constitution Society. The Federalist No. 51 James Madison. The Structure of the Government must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances between the Different Departments.
http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa51.htm (accessed Aug 23, 2011).
Constitution Society. Thoughts on Government, John Adams Apr 1776 Papers 4:86-93. http://www.constitution.org/jadams/thoughts.htm (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Department of Justice Oregon. Guarantee Clause Provision of the United States No. 8286. http://www.doj.state.or.us/agoffice/agopinions/op8286.pdf (accessed Jan 2, 2012).
Ellis, Joseph. 2004. His Excellency, George Washington. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
FindLaw. Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1 (1849). http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=48&page=1 (accessed Jan 6, 2012).
Flexner, James Thomas. 1974. Washington, The Indispensable Man. London: William Collins Sons & Co Ltd.
Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies. George Washington to Sir Edward Newenham.
http://founders-blog.blogspot.com/2008/08/george-washington-to-sir-edward.html (accessed Aug 2011).
Justia.com. US Supreme Court Center. Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946). http://supreme.justia.com/us/328/549/ (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Justia.com. US Supreme Court Center. Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923). http://supreme.justia.com/us/328/549/ (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Justia.com. US Supreme Court Center. Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. V. State of Oregon (1912) http://supreme.justia.com/us/223/118/ (accessed Jan 2012).
Library of Congress. CQ Supreme Court Collection. Liberty. www.//library.cqpress.com/scc/document (accessed Oct 5, 2010).
Library of Congress. CQ Supreme Court Collection. Meyer v Nebraska. www.//library.cqpress.com/scc/document (accessed Oct 5, 2010).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 2002. The Rights of Conscience Inalienable – Bruce Frohnen, The American Republic: Primary Sources. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=669&chapter=206101&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 8, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1998. “An American Citizen” [Tench Coxe] “Thoughts on the Subject of Amendments”: II-III – Colleen A. Sheehan, Friends of the Constitution: Writings of the “Other” Federalists, 1787-1788. Editors: Sheehan, Colleen Gary McDowell.
http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=2069&chapter=156195&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1998. “An American Citizen” [Tench Coxe] “An Examination of the Constitution of the United States”- Colleen A. Sheehan, Friends of the Constitution: Writings of the “Other” Federalists, 1787-1788. Editors: Sheehan, Colleen Gary McDowell.
http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=2069&chapter=156256&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1998. “A Freeman” [Tench Coxe] Essays: I-III – Colleen a. Sheehan, Friends of the Constitution: Writings of the “Other” Federalists, 1787-1788. Editors: Sheehan, Colleen Gary McDowell.
http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=2069&chapter=156158&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1998. Benjamin Franklin Speech – Colleen A. Sheehan, Friends of the Constitution: Writings of the “Other” Federalists, 1787-1788. Editors: Sheehan, Colleen Gary McDowell.
http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=2069&chapter=156195&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1989. The Basic Principles of the American Constitution – James McClellan, Liberty, Order, and Justice: An Introduction to the Constitutional Principles of American Government. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=679&chapter=68491&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1989. The Constitutions of Antiquity – James McClellan, Liberty, Order, and Justice: An Introduction to the Constitutional Principles of American Government. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=679&chapter=68303&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1989. The Meaning of Constitutional Government – James McClellan, Liberty, Order, and Justice: An Introduction to the Constitutional Principles of American Government. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=679&chapter=68301&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. 1989. Plans and Progress at Philadelphia – James McClellan, Liberty, Order, and Justice: An Introduction to the Constitutional Principles of American Government. http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=679&chapter=68438&layout=html&Itemid=27 (accessed Jan 5, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. Of the Right of Conscience; And of the Freedom of Speech and of the Press – St. George Tucker, View of the Constitution of the United States with Selected Writings (1803). http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=693#toc_list (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. Of the Several Forms of Government – St. George Tucker, View of the Constitution of the United States with Selected Writings (1803). http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=693#toc_list (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. On Sovereignty and Legislature – St. George Tucker, View of the Constitution of the United States with Selected Writings (1803). http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=693#toc_list (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Liberty Fund, Inc. View of the Constitution of the United States – St. George Tucker, View of the Constitution of the United States with Selected Writings(1803). http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php?title=693#toc_list (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Meese III, Edwin, David Forte, Matthew Spalding. 2005. The Heritage Guide to the Constitution. Heritage Foundation. Washington DC: Regnery Publishing, 282-284.
NowPublic. Sovereign Citizens As our Founding Father’s intended! http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sovereign-citizens-our-founding-fathers-intended (accessed 1/7/2012)
Natelson, Robert. 2002. A Republic, Not a Democracy? Initiative, Referendum, and the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause. LexisNexis, Texas Law Review.
Natelson, Robert. 1999. Are Initiatives and Referenda Contrary to the Constitution’s “Republican Form of Government”?. Independent Research.
Steiner, Henry, Philip Alston, Ryan Goodman. 2007. International Human Rights in Context, Law Politics Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teaching American History. A Democratic Federalist, Tench Coxe, November 26, 1787. http://www.teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1775 (accessed Jan 5, 2012). Ashbrook Center at Ashland University.
Teaching American History. Circular to the States – George Washington June 14, 1783. http://www.teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=1775 (accessed July 2, 2011). Ashbrook Center at Ashland University.
The Founders’ Constitution. Article 2, Clauses 2 and 3: James Madison, Letters of Helvidius, nos. 1—4. University of Chicago Press and the Liberty Fund. http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/ (accessed Jan 2, 2012).
The Founders’ Constitution. Article 4, Section 4: Document 3 – Records of the Federal Convention. University of Chicago Press and the Liberty Fund. http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/ (accessed Jan 2, 2012).
The Founders’ Constitution. Article, Section 4: Document 13 – William Rawle, A view of the Constitution of the United States 295—304, 305—7 1829 (2d ed.) University of Chicago Press and the Liberty Fund. http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/ (accessed Jan 2, 2012).
The Founders’ Constitution. Republican Government: Chapter 4, Document 7 – Thomas Jefferson, Autobiography. University of Chicago Press and the Liberty Fund. http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/ (accessed Jan 2, 2012).
The Founders’ Constitution. Republican Government: Chapter 4, Document 8 – The Essex Result. University of Chicago Press and the Liberty Fund. http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/ (accessed Jan 2, 2012).
United Nations. The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cpr.html (accessed Jan 4, 2012).
United States Department of Justice. Legal Standards Applicable Under 18 U.S.C. 2340-2340 A. http://www.justice.gov/olc/18usc23402340a2.htm (accessed Jan 4, 2012).
United States Department of State. The Federalist No. 10 (1786) James Madison. http://eca.state.gov/education/engteaching/pubs/AmLnC/br7.htm (accessed 1/5/2012). Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs.
United States National Archive. Washington’s Inaugural Address of 1789. http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/farewell/sd106-21.pdf (accessed June 20, 2011)
Wikimedia Foundation. Inalienable v Unalienable. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/inalienable (accessed Jan 8, 2012).
Wikimedia Foundation. Luther v. Borden http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luther_v._Borden (accessed Jan 1, 2012).
Wikimedia Foundation. Oligarchy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy\ (accessed July 2011).
Wikimedia Foundation. Natural and legal rights. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rights (accessed Jan 3, 2012).
The Founders used the word "unalienable" as defined by William Blackstone in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1:93, when he defined unalienable rights as: "Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and therefore called natural rights, such as life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislature has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture."
1215.org. Republic vs. Democracy. http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm (accessed Jan 6, 2012).
1215.org. Sovereignty of the People. http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/sovreign.htm (accessed Jan 6, 2012).
Videos of Brain and Body Science
There are eleven videos which document the science; I hope you can correlate the evidence to help others who may be victims. Ask the media and government why the silence?
Click here to view. All 11 video's
Copyright 2011 Tami Stainfield for President. All rights reserved. Tami Stainfield has not granted any persons or organizations rights to utilize or distribute Tami Stainfeild thoughts, quotes, ideas and intellectual property. Intellectual quotes, logic, and theories remain the property of Tami L. Stainfield
Tami Stainfield
3256 Mexico Road
Marion, KY 42064
United States
ph: 270-965-1898